Inconvenient Truth (Movie Reviews)

An Inconvenient Truth is a popular movie that Al Gore produced. There are some reviews that few people agree with him and others disagree. This essay will explain the reviews that Roger Ebert and A. O. Scott mentioned and then I will put my opinion about their reviews.

Roger Ebert believes that the global warming is real (Ebert, 2008). He said that the government should begin an immediate action to stop and reverse it. Because as soon as government move to be careful from the effects of global warming. There will be a choice to avoid disasters. If they delay their action, in about a decade the planet may reach the maximum point, which will lead to the destruction of civilizations and all is alive on this planet. From this point the author confirmed that the cause of global warming is human activity.

A.O. Scott mentions that the movie shouldn’t have been produced and even it were produced it should have had another person than Al Gore. This is because Mr. Al Gore doesn’t have a proper method to show his information, because he speaks cynically rather than talk seriously. Davis Guggenheim said that the movie is a multimedia presentation on climate change (Scott, 2006). The author cited the Davis Guggenheim’s documentary program, which speaks about the dangers of climate change.

In conclusion, my opinion about the Global warming is a real issue in the world that the all human face. The movie presented some of the interesting information like what it will affect our planet in the future.

Bibliography:
Ebert, Roger. "An Inconvenient Truth :: Reviews." Rogerebert.com :: Movie reviews, essays and the Movie Answer Man from film critic Roger Ebert. 2 June 2006. 09 Apr. 2009 .

SCOTT, A. O. "Warning of Calamities and Hoping for a Change in 'An Inconvenient Truth'" Movies. 24 May 2006. NY Times. 6 Apr. 2009 .